作者: Allegra, Awan, Awan, Bessell, Betz, Bhoopathi, Bossuyt, Brinkmann, Brocklehurst, Buchen, Burkhardt, Cancela-Rodriguez, Chen, Cheng, Cheng, Conway, Delavarian, Divani, Driemel, Driemel, Driemel, Du, Ebenezar, Epstein, Epstein, Faggiano, Farah, Farah, Fedele, Ferlay, Furness, Garg, Glenny, Gomez Serrano, Guneri, Gupta, Hegde, Hohlweg-Majert, Holmstrup, Jayaprakash, Koch, Koch, Kulapaditharom, Landis, Lane, Lee, Leeflang, Leunig, Levine, Li, Li, Lingen, Liu, Lodi, Macaskill, Macfarlane, Majumder, Mallia, Maraki, Maraki, Mashberg, McIntosh, Mehanna, Mehrotra, Mehrotra, Mehrotra, Mojsa, Nagaraju, Napier, Navone, Navone, Navone, Navone, Ng, Nieman, Onizawa, Onofre, Park, Parkin, Patton, Petti, Poate, Rahman, Ranaa, Reboiras-López, Reibul, Reitsma, Remmerbach, Remmerbach, Remmerbach, Remmerbach, Remmerbach, Rethman, Rusthoven, Sandler, Scheer, Scheifele, Schwarz, Sciubba, Scully, Scully, Scully, Scully, Seijas-Naya, Seoane Lestón, Sharwani, Sharwani, Shklar, Silverman, Silverman, Stell, Svirsky, Swider, Tang, Tilley, Torres-Rendon, Ujaoney, Upadhyay, Vecchia, Waal, Walsh, Wang, Warnakulasuriya, Warnakulasuriya, Warnakulasuriya, Whiting, Wyatt
发布日期: 2015年5月1日
一项对41项研究(共4002名参与者)进行的系统性综述,评估了辅助检测方法在诊断临床上存在病变患者的口腔癌和潜在恶性疾病方面的准确性。结果显示,在12项研究中,口腔细胞学检查具有最高的综合准确率,敏感度为0.91(95% CI:0.81至0.96),特异性为0.91(95% CI:0.81至0.95)。在14项研究中,活体染色法的敏感度为0.84(95% CI:0.74至0.90),特异性为0.70(95% CI:0.59至0.79)。基于光学的检测方法在11项研究中的敏感度为0.91(95% CI:0.77至0.97),但特异性较低,为0.58(95% CI:0.22至0.87)。综述结果证实,临床上存在病变的患者需要进行专业的活检和组织学评估,因为没有任何辅助检测方法可以取代当前的诊断标准。